GLOBALISATION- IDEAL WAY

What is suggested in this blog is the only way Americans, or British, or Canadian, or French, or Brazilian, or Russian, or Malaysian etc. can ensure jobs remain in their respective countries.

Globalisation as practised till now has failed to bring cheer to the people of this world. No two countries are identical. Pressure to satisfy stock markets has forced management of many companies to shift production to any country that can aid it to maintain its profit. Seen in this context globalisation is a facade or euphemism for protecting corporate profits.
It's a no brainer. Loss of jobs by outsourcing production is a loss to the economy that is never rectified. For example, any company that shifts production say from USA will not generate demand for any capital equipment. Hence, there will be no incentive for an investor to set up a capital equipment plant. Absence of capital equipment means no requirement for maintenance and spare parts. Job losses are obvious. So, what is the way forward?
For example if a Chinese or Japanese company wants to export to USA or India, they should set up local manufacturing. This step will neutralise to some extent incomparable conditions say between USA and China or China and India.

To avoid balance of payment crisis an exporter from China who exports to India will get paid in Indian Currency. An exporter from India who exports to China will get paid in Chinese Currency. Trade will balance.